Your architecture data finally talks back.

Ask questions in plain English. Get instant, sourced answers about applications, integrations, ownership, and impact.

No dashboards. No queries. No waiting for the one person who knows.

The data is there. Getting answers from it shouldn't be this hard.

You already have the architecture data. Applications mapped. Integrations documented. Capabilities defined. It's sitting in your EA tool right now.

And yet.

When the CIO asks, "What's the downstream impact of retiring Application X?" — your team doesn't open a dashboard and answer in 30 seconds. They open six views, cross-reference two exports, check a spreadsheet someone updated last quarter, and schedule a meeting to confirm with the three people who actually know.

Here's what that looks like in practice:

2 hours tracing integration dependencies manually
1 hour confirming data ownership in a shared doc that may be outdated
3 hours building a slide deck to communicate what the data already says
1 meeting to validate what you found with someone who has the tribal knowledge
Total: 7+ hours to answer one question

Multiply that across every retirement decision, every migration assessment, every "who owns this?" conversation. Your architecture team spends 80% of their time finding information. 20% using it.

The data isn't the problem. Access is.

And the cost isn't just time.

Three things happen when architecture answers take days instead of seconds.

Decisions get made without the data.

The project team can't wait two weeks for your impact analysis. They move forward and find the broken integrations in production.

Architecture becomes a bottleneck, not an enabler.

Stakeholders stop asking because the turnaround is too slow. Your architecture practice gets sidelined from the decisions it was built to inform.

Knowledge stays trapped in three people's heads.

When they leave — and they will — the organization doesn't lose employees. It loses its architectural memory.

Your EA tool was supposed to fix this. Instead, it created a new kind of expertise barrier: now you need training just to ask a question.

Meet Gyanii. Your architecture assistant that actually answers.

Gyanii is the AI-native enterprise architecture assistant that turns your architecture repository into a conversation.

Ask in plain English. Get answers grounded in your actual data — applications, capabilities, data objects, integrations, ownership — with sources cited on every response.

"What applications depend on SAP ECC?"

"Who owns the Customer Master Data object?"

"What's the impact of retiring our legacy CRM?"

"Show me all integrations between Finance and HR capabilities."

No dashboards.No queries.No tickets.

Just questions and answers. About your architecture. In seconds.

From question to insight in three steps.

You ask a question.

Type it the way you'd ask a colleague. Plain English. No query syntax. No filters to configure. Gyanii classifies your question and determines the best retrieval strategy automatically.

Gyanii searches your architecture — two ways at once.

Vector search finds the relevant documents. Graph search traces the relationships. Combined, they surface answers that neither approach could find alone. We call this hybrid intelligence — and it's why Gyanii finds connections that keyword search misses.

You get a sourced answer, tailored to your role.

Select your profile — executive, architect, technical, project manager, business analyst, or default — and get an answer shaped for how you think. Every response includes the source documents, so you can verify and go deeper.

The whole process takes seconds, not hours.

What Gyanii does for your architecture practice.

Trace dependencies in seconds, not sprints.

"What breaks if we retire Application X?" Used to be a two-week project. With Gyanii, it's a question. The graph search traverses integration paths, upstream and downstream, and returns the full dependency chain.

One answer, six perspectives.

A CIO and a solutions architect need different things from the same question. Gyanii's 6 response profiles adapt tone, depth, and focus to whoever is asking. Same data, right framing.

Every answer shows its sources.

No black boxes. Every Gyanii response includes the source documents and graph relationships it used. Click through to verify, explore further, or build on what you found.

Your data stays your data.

Gyanii works with your architecture repository. The answers come from your data, not a generic model. What you put in is what you get back — specific, accurate, yours.

Ingests the frameworks you already use.

ArchiMate, TOGAF, and other EA framework data flows directly into Gyanii. No reformatting, no migration project. Connect your existing exports and start asking questions the same day.

Conversations that continue.

Gyanii remembers context across a session. Ask a follow-up. Refine your question. Build a line of inquiry the way you would with a knowledgeable colleague.

One assistant. Six ways to answer.

Every person who touches architecture data needs something different. Gyanii adapts.

Executive

CIOs, CTOs, VPs

Strategic summaries. Impact in business terms. Decision-ready framing.

Architect

Enterprise & solutions architects

Full technical depth. Relationship maps. Standards and patterns context.

Technical

Developers, integration engineers

System-level detail. API and interface specifics. Data flow clarity.

Project

Project & program managers

Timeline implications. Dependency risks. Stakeholder impact.

Business

Business analysts, capability owners

Business capability mapping. Process alignment. Ownership clarity.

Default

Anyone

Balanced depth. Clear language. A smart starting point for any question.

Select your profile. Ask your question. Get the answer shaped for you.

Questions we hear most.

Your architecture data has the answers. Start asking.

Gyanii gives every stakeholder in your organization instant, sourced access to your architecture knowledge. No training. No dashboards. No waiting.

Join the early access list. Be the first to ask your architecture.